Washington: A top American official has opposed the grant of visa
to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi because of the "very serious"
doubts that remain over his role in the "horrific" 2002 riots in
Gujarat.
"Modi shall not be granted the privilege of US visa
because of the very serious doubts that remain and that hang over Modi
relative to his role in the horrific events of 2002 in Gujarat," said
Katrina Lantos Swett, vice chairwoman of the United States Commission on
International Religious Freedom.
The bipartisan government
commission reviews the facts and circumstances of religious freedom
violations and makes policy recommendations to the US President, the
secretary of State and Congress.
"There are many, many unanswered questions that remain, there
are at are many grave allegations, there are huge doubts," she was
quoted as saying by the New York Times.
When asked about the
possibility of Mr Modi's nomination as the BJP's prime ministerial
candidate for the next Lok Sabha polls, she said, "It is no outside
nation's or no individual's role to tell them who should be the next
leader of India."
"For the people of India, I think it is
important for them to consider very carefully who it is who they want to
be their next prime minister," she added.
In 2005, the US denied
Mr Modi a diplomatic visa and revoked his existing tourist/business
visa under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which makes a foreign
government official who is responsible for particularly severe
violations of religious freedom ineligible for an American visa, the NYT
said.
"Obviously what happened in 2002 in Gujarat was sectarian
violence on a really massive scale. I don't think you can say that that
wasn't a religious issue. It was a religious issue and the 2005 visa
denial harks back to that," she said.
Mr Modi has been lobbying hard to get the decision reversed.
During a recent visit to the US, BJP president Rajnath Singh had said he would request for a review of visa ban on Mr Modi.
When
pointed out that courts have not yet found any evidence of Mr Modi's
involvement in the 2002 riots, Ms Swett said: "Certainly in our system
of justice you can be found not guilty, which is not the same thing as
found innocent."
"Under these circumstances we should follow our
laws, which say that we should not give a visa. Of course Modi wants us
to reverse our position because that would be part of his rehabilitation
process," she said.
"One of the things that concern us is that
Modi seems more concerned with rehabilitating his own reputation than
with providing recompense and rehabilitation for the surviving victims
of those terrible events," she added.
http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/narendra-modi-shall-not-be-granted-us-visa-says-american-official-406670?pfrom=home-lateststories