|
COMPARATIVE STUDY
“(Allah is) the Creator of the heavens and the earth: He has made for you pairs from among yourselves and pairs among cattle: by this means does He multiply you: there is nothing whatever like unto Him and He is the One that hears and sees (all things). To Him belong the keys of the heavens and the earth: He enlarges and restricts the Sustenance to whom He will: for He knows full well all things.” Quran 42:11-12
Sunday, June 12, 2016
Condolences to the families of the Orlando shooting victims
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
Muhammad Ali's funeral
|
Friday, March 4, 2016
there is no doubt
This is the Book (the Quran), whereof there is no doubt, a guidance to those who are Al-Muttaqun [the pious and righteous persons who fear Allah much (abstain from all kinds of sins and evil deeds which He has forbidden) and love Allah much (perform all kinds of good deeds which He has ordained)].
THE QURAN 2:2
THE QURAN 2:2
Monday, October 5, 2015
Dadri killing a blot on India
This is with reference to the news report “Murder over beef: Two more arrested.” (Oct. 4)
The brutal killing of the 55-year-old Muhammad Ikhlaq over rumors that he ate/stored beef in Dadri, a small town on the outskirts of the national capital Delhi has come as the most shocking event in recent times.
This is beyond imagination that people can go to this extent by killing their fellow human beings on the issue of one’s personal beliefs on what to eat and what not to.
I learned some of those involved in the murder were friends of Ikhlaq and would cook and dine together. Members of both the communities would join each other’s festival and celebrate festivals like Eid, Diwali and Rakhsha Bandhan for decades.
Then how come the same man though of a different faith is dragged out of his house by a frenzy mob of 200 Hindus and beaten to death for allegedly consuming beef, which is banned? It is not yet confirmed whether he ate beef or mutton, which in any case is under police investigation.
This heinous crime brings to the fore the simmering communal tension prevailing among communities and should be condemned by all sane people of the country.
However it looks like part of a very sinister but disturbing pattern that is out to tear apart the fabric of communal harmony. This takes us to another logical question: Are we moving from democracy to a state of mobocracy?
If India is to be a respectable and developed country, we have to stop all this nonsense of religions bigotry. Religions must be confined to one’s personal beliefs and should not be imposed on others. If not restrained, such madness will have a very serious impact on social lives as also on the economic sector.
The governments — both the center and provincial — must ensure that such incidents are not repeated and offenders are brought to justice even if that needs fast-track courts.
— Ramesh G. Jethwani, Bangalore, India
http://www.arabnews.com/letters/news/815886
The brutal killing of the 55-year-old Muhammad Ikhlaq over rumors that he ate/stored beef in Dadri, a small town on the outskirts of the national capital Delhi has come as the most shocking event in recent times.
This is beyond imagination that people can go to this extent by killing their fellow human beings on the issue of one’s personal beliefs on what to eat and what not to.
I learned some of those involved in the murder were friends of Ikhlaq and would cook and dine together. Members of both the communities would join each other’s festival and celebrate festivals like Eid, Diwali and Rakhsha Bandhan for decades.
Then how come the same man though of a different faith is dragged out of his house by a frenzy mob of 200 Hindus and beaten to death for allegedly consuming beef, which is banned? It is not yet confirmed whether he ate beef or mutton, which in any case is under police investigation.
This heinous crime brings to the fore the simmering communal tension prevailing among communities and should be condemned by all sane people of the country.
However it looks like part of a very sinister but disturbing pattern that is out to tear apart the fabric of communal harmony. This takes us to another logical question: Are we moving from democracy to a state of mobocracy?
If India is to be a respectable and developed country, we have to stop all this nonsense of religions bigotry. Religions must be confined to one’s personal beliefs and should not be imposed on others. If not restrained, such madness will have a very serious impact on social lives as also on the economic sector.
The governments — both the center and provincial — must ensure that such incidents are not repeated and offenders are brought to justice even if that needs fast-track courts.
— Ramesh G. Jethwani, Bangalore, India
http://www.arabnews.com/letters/news/815886
Will Take Up Dadri Mob Killing With UN
Uttar Pradesh minister Mohammad Azam Khan today
sought intervention of United Nations to look into the "miseries" of
minorities in India.
Citing the lynching of a Muslim man following rumours that he ate beef in Uttar Pradesh's Dadri area, Mr Khan said he was disturbed by a series of incidents against minorities and would urge the UN to take up the matter with the Indian government.
In a letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Mr Khan also attacked RSS accusing it of working to turn secular and pluralistic India into a majoritarian theocratic nation as 'Hindu Rashtra'.
"Facist forces are attempting to create a divide in the society by launching a hate campaign against Muslims and Dadri incident is an example of this," the Uttar Pardesh minister told reporters in Lucknow.
In his letter, the minister said there had been sporadic incidents of ethnic or communal clashes, but the real essence of freedom and secularism has never been under question or threat as it was for last one and half years.
"The new government took oath in the name of Constitution of India, but its motivation, inspiration and guiding light also comes from some other fundamentalist and extra constitutional authority named RSS," he said.
"The government provides tacit support to those campaign or programmes that create fear among minorities and intimidate them," he alleged.
Azam Khan said that to form government in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and other states, RSS certainly needed an issue on which two communities come face to face.
"After Babri Masjid incident, Dadri was held as it is close to Delhi and the BJP-ruled central government found it easy to use its influence and create tension," he alleged.
"I humbly request to the highest international body to look into our miseries and take care of us and impress upon the Indian government to stick to international agreements and allow to flourish secularism and plurality in the country and not to push the agenda of extra constitutional authorities to turn India into theocratic majority Hindu nation," Mr Khan said.
The minister also said he wanted President Pranab Mukhrjee and PM Modi to call a round table conference and discuss campaign against Muslims in the name of beef and attempts to turn India into a Hindu nation.
Accusing the NDA government of keeping double standard, he said, "They talk something before the world leaders and the UNGA, but do opposite and provide tacit support to RSS and its affiliates to intimidate minorities in the country to convert India into majority Hindu nation."
To a question, he said that narrating his pain before the UN should not be taken as a statement against India. "The UN was constituted to ensure that human rights were not violated in the world and it is viewed equally, therefore I have narrated my pain before it (through the letter)," he said.
A week ago, Mohammad Akhlaq, a resident of Greater Noida, was dragged out of his house after a mob alleged he had killed a cow in his house.
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/will-take-up-dadri-mob-killing-with-un-says-minister-azam-khan-1226291?utm_source=taboola
Citing the lynching of a Muslim man following rumours that he ate beef in Uttar Pradesh's Dadri area, Mr Khan said he was disturbed by a series of incidents against minorities and would urge the UN to take up the matter with the Indian government.
In a letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Mr Khan also attacked RSS accusing it of working to turn secular and pluralistic India into a majoritarian theocratic nation as 'Hindu Rashtra'.
"Facist forces are attempting to create a divide in the society by launching a hate campaign against Muslims and Dadri incident is an example of this," the Uttar Pardesh minister told reporters in Lucknow.
In his letter, the minister said there had been sporadic incidents of ethnic or communal clashes, but the real essence of freedom and secularism has never been under question or threat as it was for last one and half years.
"The new government took oath in the name of Constitution of India, but its motivation, inspiration and guiding light also comes from some other fundamentalist and extra constitutional authority named RSS," he said.
"The government provides tacit support to those campaign or programmes that create fear among minorities and intimidate them," he alleged.
Azam Khan said that to form government in Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and other states, RSS certainly needed an issue on which two communities come face to face.
"After Babri Masjid incident, Dadri was held as it is close to Delhi and the BJP-ruled central government found it easy to use its influence and create tension," he alleged.
"I humbly request to the highest international body to look into our miseries and take care of us and impress upon the Indian government to stick to international agreements and allow to flourish secularism and plurality in the country and not to push the agenda of extra constitutional authorities to turn India into theocratic majority Hindu nation," Mr Khan said.
The minister also said he wanted President Pranab Mukhrjee and PM Modi to call a round table conference and discuss campaign against Muslims in the name of beef and attempts to turn India into a Hindu nation.
Accusing the NDA government of keeping double standard, he said, "They talk something before the world leaders and the UNGA, but do opposite and provide tacit support to RSS and its affiliates to intimidate minorities in the country to convert India into majority Hindu nation."
To a question, he said that narrating his pain before the UN should not be taken as a statement against India. "The UN was constituted to ensure that human rights were not violated in the world and it is viewed equally, therefore I have narrated my pain before it (through the letter)," he said.
A week ago, Mohammad Akhlaq, a resident of Greater Noida, was dragged out of his house after a mob alleged he had killed a cow in his house.
http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/will-take-up-dadri-mob-killing-with-un-says-minister-azam-khan-1226291?utm_source=taboola
Labels:
international body,
modi,
Mohammad Akhlaq,
RSS,
UN
Friday, October 2, 2015
Mob in Indian village kills man over cow slaughter
Bisara, India (CNN)By
and large, Hindus and Muslims live side-by-side in relative peace
across India. But every now and then, the calm is punctured by moments
of madness — and deadly violence. The sleepy, dusty, mostly Hindu
village of Bisara, near the country's capital, became such a place this
week.
According to eyewitness
accounts, this blood-curdling sequence of events unfolded in a matter of
minutes Monday night: A Hindu temple announced sacrilege; villagers
formed an angry mob; and normal people, fueled by each other's presence,
became assailants.
A Muslim
blacksmith, Mohammad Akhlaq, and his son Danish were battered by people
who knew them. The father died, and his son was has been hospitalized
with critical injuries.
What triggered
the bloody assault? A rumor that a cow was slaughtered in that
nondescript neighborhood, home to mostly Rajputs — a high-ranking
valiant Hindu caste meaning "sons of the kings."
In Hinduism, cows are deemed sacred and their killing a sin.
'It was blood all over my son's face. He is gone'
"Two
young men came to me that night and asked me to announce on the
loudspeaker that there's a carcass of a cow lying nearby," the temple
priest, Sukhdas Mahatma, told CNN.
"They
pressured me to make that announcement. What could I do? I had to make
that announcement," he said, moving his fingers on his flowing white
beard.
Soon
after his broadcast, villagers crowded around the temple compound, and
decided to set out for Akhlaq's home through the winding, narrow and
broken lanes. They believed the 50-year-old blacksmith was the culprit
because his faith doesn't prohibit eating beef. And his was one of the
two Muslim households in that neighborhood of more than 6,000 people.
"I
heard loud bangs on the front door of our house," said Asghari Begum,
the mother of Mohammad Akhlaq. "Then I heard them shouting expletives,"
she said. Before she could react, a group of men scaled the walls and
jumped into the house.
"They pushed me, then punched me on my face, in the abdomen," Begum said, pointing to her bruised and swollen eye.
The
mob then ran to the first floor of Akhlaq's home and dragged him out,
along with 22-year-old Danish. Both were beaten with "whatever they
(attackers) could lay their hands on," police superintendent Kiran
Sivakumar told CNN.
"It was blood all over my son's face. He is gone," moaned Begum, sitting on a cot in her dark, ground-floor room.
Six arrested
Upstairs,
the telltale signs of the raid were still everywhere. A refrigerator
that stored meat lay down broken on the floor. The ransacked rooms were
still strewn with shattered vases and sewing machines.
Police
have so far arrested six of the 10 men Akhlaq's family has named in
their initial police complaint. These were people they knew. More
arrests are likely, Sivakumar said.
Unease
was palpable in the village as the murder drew widespread media
attention. No one in the village admits to being part of the mob.
"My
son is innocent. He has been falsely implicated," said Ombir Sisodia,
father of one of the jailed men. "He was sick and sleeping when mobs
gathered around after the temple announcement," Sisodia said.
Police
have seized meat samples from Akhlaq's home for testing. The family
says the meat is goat and not beef. Regardless of what kind of meat it
is, "it doesn't absolve (the attackers of) the crime," police
superintendent Sivakumar said.
Sacredness of cows
Cow slaughter is banned in most of Hindu-majority India, including in Uttar Pradesh.
This year, the western state of Maharashtra, home to Mumbai, became one of the latest to outlaw beef.
"The
sacredness of cows in India might be a cliché, but it is deeply felt,
rooted in the history of Hinduism," said novelist Manil Suri in a New York Times column.
But
"imposing ideals from a mythic past is not the answer," he wrote in the
April op-ed. "The true lesson to take away from history is how
utilitarian goals can shape religious custom. Hinduism has always been a
pragmatic religion; what today's India needs is accommodation."
Rishabh Pratap and Roshni Majumdar contributed to this report.
An initial version of this story incorrectly stated the number of people killed in the attack.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/02/asia/india-mob-murder-beef/index.html
Friday, September 4, 2015
They're drowning
They're drowning
|
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
PICTURE MAKERS
PICTURE MAKERS
Once Prophet (saw) entered into the house of 'Aishah (rah) where he saw a curtain is containing pictures. His face changed and he tore it into pieces and said, "The people who receive the severest punishment from Allah will be the picture makers."
Al-Bukhari in Kitab al-Adab no. 6109; Muslim in Kitab Az-Zakah no 2107
The Hadith and others are general for every kind of representation, whether it has a shadow, like a figure, or if it does not have a shadow, which is like a drawing on a wall, paper, clothing and so forth. It is confirmed that the Prophet (SAW) entered the Ka’bah and it contained pictures and he asked for a pitcher of water and he began to efface them, saying,
An exception to this ruling during this time is money containing the picture of kings as well as passports and identification cards. Due to the need and necessity of these items, it is allowed to carry them according to need.
-Shaikh Ibn Jibreen
The Muslim should submit to the teachings of Islam and not argue with them by saying, "But I am not worshipping them or prostrating to them!" If we think about just one aspect of the evil caused by the prevalence of photographs and pictures in our times, we will understand something of the wisdom behind this prohibition: that aspect is the great corruption caused by the provoking of physical desires and subsequent spread of immorality caused by these pictures.
The Muslim should not keep any pictures of animate beings in his house, because they will prevent the angels from entering.
The Prophet (saw) said: "The angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or pictures."
Al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, 10/380
Allah(swt) knows the best
Once Prophet (saw) entered into the house of 'Aishah (rah) where he saw a curtain is containing pictures. His face changed and he tore it into pieces and said, "The people who receive the severest punishment from Allah will be the picture makers."
Al-Bukhari in Kitab al-Adab no. 6109; Muslim in Kitab Az-Zakah no 2107
The Hadith and others are general for every kind of representation, whether it has a shadow, like a figure, or if it does not have a shadow, which is like a drawing on a wall, paper, clothing and so forth. It is confirmed that the Prophet (SAW) entered the Ka’bah and it contained pictures and he asked for a pitcher of water and he began to efface them, saying,
An exception to this ruling during this time is money containing the picture of kings as well as passports and identification cards. Due to the need and necessity of these items, it is allowed to carry them according to need.
-Shaikh Ibn Jibreen
The Muslim should submit to the teachings of Islam and not argue with them by saying, "But I am not worshipping them or prostrating to them!" If we think about just one aspect of the evil caused by the prevalence of photographs and pictures in our times, we will understand something of the wisdom behind this prohibition: that aspect is the great corruption caused by the provoking of physical desires and subsequent spread of immorality caused by these pictures.
The Muslim should not keep any pictures of animate beings in his house, because they will prevent the angels from entering.
The Prophet (saw) said: "The angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or pictures."
Al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, 10/380
Allah(swt) knows the best
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Monday, October 20, 2014
Does Islam preach extremism?
In the name of Allah…
Does Islam preach extremism?
An intensive campaign by Muslims against extremism.
Among the world religions, Islam is the finally reintroduced religion and since its reintroduction for fourteen centuries, it has attracted into its fold almost one fourth of the world’s total population.
Even people who do not accept Islam have been wholeheartedly appreciative of many of the salient features of Islam. The outstanding characteristics such as the following few have charmed the non-Muslims.
1. Clear concept of God.
2. No mediators or priests between God and man.
3. Strong and vehement opposition to the superstitious practices.
4. The brotherhood it has created at the global level by abolishing the divisions on the basis of caste, language and race.
Yet a few among them entertain hatred and deep grievances against Islam. The belief that Islam favours extremism and creates extremists is fast spreading. Among the causes that make the non Muslims hate Islam, this belief plays a prime role.
People who think that Islam favours extremism can be divided into two groups.
The first group of people has come to that conclusion on seeing the activities of few people among the Muslims and on observing the media reports related to Muslims.
The second group has fallen under this impression on reading the Quranic verses related to war and learning about the wars lead by Prophet Muhammed (Sal).
Let us see whether the notions held by the second group is correct or not.
There are verses in the Holy Quran that stress the need for war. It is also undeniably true that the Prophet Muhammed (Sal) had led a number of wars. These facts are clear and apparent and there is nothing to hide.
If they look into the matter in the right perspective, and approach it in the way it should be understood, they will realize that they have come to a wrong conclusion.
The life of The Prophet Muhammed (sal) may be divided in to three stages.
ü The first stage is his life from his birth up to his fortieth age.
ü
ü The second stage is thirteen years of his life starting from his fortieth age when he introduced himself as the Messenger of Allah up to the end of his stay in his native place at the age of fifty three.
ü
ü The third stage is his ten years of life starting from his expulsion from his birth place, arrival to Medinah, winning the hearts of the Medinites and establishing a rule ,till his death at the age of sixty three.
Among these three stages , in the first stage he lived a simple life by doing business. He did not preach an y doctrine. Therefore his first period does not give any room for criticism.
In the second period of his life, he faced untold miseries at the hands of his relatives and the people of his native place. He along with his followers were ostracized and expelled from the town. Many of his followers were murdered. Many were tortured. Though the Holy Prophet (sal) was born in Kuraish, the highly respected tribe by Meccans, he was not spared and subjected to torture.
He had all the reasons to justify his action if he took up arms and retaliate. Even his followers asked him to do so. But all through these thirteen years he never ordered his followers to retaliate nor commanded to kill any individual. Instead, the only reply he gave all these years was ‘he was commanded to keep patience’. It is true that there are Muslims facing torture and sufferings now in many parts of the world. But it is to be borne in mind that what the Holy Prophet (sal) and his followers underwent was thousands of time severer than the ones faced by the people of our time.
Then he was pushed to an extreme situation where he found out that he could not live in his native town anymore, he underwent an arduous travel of 300 miles to reach Medina and won the heart of the people and established a rule there.
Even after coming to Medina and establishing a rule, his enemies did not permit him to live peacefully. They waged many wars against him. They instigated other tribes against him. At one stage, Arabs of all the regions forged a front against him and waged a war. This is called the war of Trench in the History of Islam.
Only when the war was imposed on him by his enemies, he involved in war in order to safeguard his country and its citizens. What would a country do? Or what should a country under such a dangerous situation do? Is it not the duty of the head of the affected state to safeguard the country and its subjects? The Prophet Muhammed (sal) did the same thing. He did not involve himself in war with an aim to root out non Muslims.
The Jews and Christians lived peacefully under his rule. Once the Prophet Muhammed (sal) mortgaged his armour to a Jew. He could not recover it from the Jew till the end of his life. Such is the economic freedom the Jews enjoyed in his rule. The Jews even approached him to get solutions for the disputes that arose among them.
So, the verses found in the Holy Quran enjoining war have been revealed only after the establishment of the Muslim rule and the command is directed to the Government. The people of that period would not have accepted Islam if it is declared that war should be waged against all non Muslims. People had understood that the command of the Quran meant only to the Government and the Country. Therefore people came in groups after groups to embrace Islam.
Here it is important to note that the commands of the Quran on war are directed towards governments and countries and not towards individuals and groups. The individuals and groups are not entitled to wage war.
Quran talks about the crime and punishments such as amputation of hands for theft, death sentence or 100 lashes for prostitution, tit for tat and eye for eye etc. But the execution of the laws of the Quran cannot be taken up by individuals and groups. On the contrary, the responsibility to dispense justice rests with only a Muslim Government.
Even while commanding to wage war, the Holy Quran lays many conditions to the Muslim Governments.
Don’t initiate war.
And fight in the way of Allah those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly Allah likes not the transgressors.
The Holy Quran 2:190
This verse commands not to make aggression and not to cross the limits.
Don’t fight with those who withdraw from the battle field.
If they cease, Allah is Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful. (2:192)
And fight them until no fitnah and worship is for Allah(alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against zalimun. (2:193)
These verses clearly state that if the enemies withdrew from the fighting, they should not be attacked.
Accepting the peace offer.
But if they incline to peace, you also incline to it and (put your) trust in Allah. Verily He is the All Hearer, the All Knower. (8:61)
This verse says that If the enemy country come forward with peace offer, a Muslim country however powerful it might be, should accept it.
And if anyone of the Mushrikun (disbelievers) seeks your protection, then grant him permission so that he may hear the word of Allah(the Quran), and then escort him to where he can be secure, that is because they are men who knw not. (9:06)
Islam is the only religion that asks to escort the enemy who seeks protection to a safer place.
The Quranic command is asking the competent Governments and countries, not the individuals or groups, to face the enemy in the war. But some individuals and groups misunderstand that the verse urges individuals and groups to take up arms and fight. They act accordingly.
The fact that the Prophet Muhammed (sal) never waged a war when he was not in power makes it clear that these misguided people’s point of view is totally wrong. On the contrary to their belief that they try to save the religion and its people by their self styled foolish activities, they rather cause harm immensly.
Allah has not given victory to any such individuals and groups in any part of the world.
Above all , the attitude of such people is responsible for the slow decline in the number of people who hold a liking for Islam.
Therefore Islam never preaches extremism. It may be easily understood that Islam is a religion of peace which preaches humane life and love.
http://www.tntj.net/281143.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)